Monday, October 16, 2006

Financial Planning

I've been coming across quite a few articles celebrating a financial plan crafted by Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams. Called the "Unified Theory of Everything Financial", here is Adams's nine-point plan:
  1. Make a will
  2. Pay off your credit cards
  3. Get term life insurance if you have a family to support
  4. Fund your 401k to the maximum
  5. Fund your IRA to the maximum
  6. Buy a house if you want to live in a house and can afford it
  7. Put six months worth of expenses in a money-market account
  8. Take whatever money is left over and invest 70% in a stock index fund and 30% in a bond fund through any discount broker and never touch it until retirement
  9. If any of this confuses you, or you have something special going on (retirement, college planning, tax issues), hire a fee-based financial planner, not one who charges a percentage of your portfolio
This does seem to be pretty comprehensive to me. I would add disability insurance to the list, and perhaps health insurance belongs there as well. Six months of expenses in cash seems a bit high to me. But I suppose with folks like E-Loan paying a phenomenal 5.5% APY, we can go higher on the cash.

Saying this deserves the Nobel Prize in economics is certainly creative exaggeration. But it's useful advice, for sure.

4 Comments:

Blogger debbiechang3 said...

eh, I guess this plan is good for those who are looking to save as much money as possible; I don't think that's biblical though. Also, I think only "rich" people can even plan in this way. Some pieces of advice seem helpful, like hiring a fee-based financial planner, if you ever needed one, although I don't know why that's better.

10:06 PM, November 07, 2006  
Blogger Ang said...

What part of the advice makes you think it's for "saving as much as possible"? I don't see that as implied by anything in the plan.

And yeah, it does assume that you live in a society which has 401k's, IRA's, and stock/bond markets available. Supposing you find yourself continuing to live in such a society, this seems to describe the prudent way to go.

3:22 PM, November 15, 2006  
Blogger debbiechang3 said...

I guess it was #4 and #5 in particular -- "fund ___ to the maximum." I took maximum to be more than the minimum matching that the company you work for might do.

10:49 AM, December 20, 2006  
Blogger Ang said...

401(k)'s and IRAs have government-imposed maximums. I believe the 401(k) maximum in 2006 is around $15K, and the Roth IRA is around $4K.

The idea here is to take maximum advantage of available tax shelters, and I don't see anything unbiblical about that.

5:58 PM, January 06, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home